Bullying:

(This I wrote for an upcoming newsletter on bullying. I may have covered some of this elsewhere in this blog but I will post a copy on here anyway.)

       What can be more "all-American" than the 1983 movie "The Christmas Story" starring Peter Billingsley as "Ralphie"? To this day it plays back-to-back all day every Christmas on cable TV. Like many movies there are several sub-plots. One of the most memorable (besides the leg lamp) is when Ralphie finally stands up to his bully. The bully in this movie, Scut Farkus, fits most of the stereotypes of a schoolyard bully. He's big, has ruddy cheeks, and is not the most popular guy outside his little entourage. Of course Ralphie was an otherwise normal kid with rather thick glasses. The solution seemed rather simple. One day, after Ralphie had enough he finally stood up to the bully (to the point of overkill) and his mother had to pull him off. Ralphie of course did not get in trouble and that was the end of the bullying topic for that movie. Ralphie (Peter Billingsley) is all grown up now.
       It would be nice if every bullying story came to such a perfect, all-American storybook ending as is frequently promised. The good guy wins and finishes off his school years happily (and popularly) ever after. I have heard many stories like this from people. I suspect that most people were bullied at some point in their lives and many claimed that they were just too nice and needed to build the adrenaline to defend themselves. After that they went on to live a normal childhood or adolescence. Of course people can also embellish stories. In real life things are not always that simple. I know because I have experienced my share of bullying. While I am on the Autistic spectrum nobody knew much about it back when I was in school and many saw me as "normal but eccentric". The conventional advice I tended to get from adults was well-meaning, but overly simplistic. It was usually along the lines of: "If he hits you, just hit him back." or "If they make fun of you, just ignore them or tell them off". Even some of the nuns in school would tell me to stand up for myself, but I knew that if I did I would be in just as much trouble if not more than the perpetrator, especially if my reaction was delayed. "Who started it?" would be a matter of my word against theirs and that of their friends. I wasn't the tallest kid but I was rather sturdy. It's not like I never thought of defending myself before. I detested violence, and while I always had a long fuse, I did get angry (just never at the appropriate moment). Adrenaline always came a few minutes too late for me. In my logical/analytical mind I would always have to think of consequences before I acted. For most people that would be a good trait, but I was too much the other extreme. I always feared that I would get suspended. Also people never seemed to understand that bullies are never alone. Even the victim is physically bigger there is usually a network of people who assist in retaliation. I was generally an independent type who had little use for group dynamics. Also, many times the bullies were popular, charming, or had well connected families. In real life bullies are rarely dumb, and they seem to intuitively know what they can and can't get away with. I even took Karate for a while, which in the 1980's was the fad way of dealing with bullies. I did OK in the sport, but it still didn't help. As with many on the Autistic spectrum I had slow processing which is is an issue in both anticipating trouble in the sometimes brief period of escalation and then reacting at the appropriate time.
       "Boys will be boys" is another issue which can be a problem. I can recall times where I was having a problem and adults seemed sympathetic to my side at least on the surface, but then I would overhear them talking about the bully in terms of "Isn't he bold, isn't he a character" in other words they were not sincere and the bully, even if he may get an occasional detention, can sense that others find it "cute". Among peers there would always be "sympathetic" girls who would say "Just ignore him, he's a loser." only to end up on a date with the bully a week later. I understand that many boys and even some girls like to play rough and many adults overlook things until it is too late. People need to know the difference between "normal boy stuff" and bullying. There are many good-intentioned adults who see bullying as a "right of passage" where "a boy becomes a man" after he stands up to his childhood bully. Our culture I feel has romanticized this concept. Many adults feel (at least regarding boys) that by ignoring bullying they are practicing some sort of "tough love" by teaching self-sufficiency. This is a big problem for those with developmental differences. I mean there are always "low class" bullies who will pick on anyone, but most bullies are smart enough to know that some targets are off limits. That would include those with obvious physical handicaps or those who are in special-ed. On the other hand, adults may be more protective of a person with any visible disability or even an invisible one if it is properly labeled. Back then I didn't have any appropriate "labels", except for ADD and few people even knew what that was at the time. I was otherwise a stocky boy- and not just that but an Italian-American boy- not someone who should be acting like a wimp.
       Another misconception people have about bullying is that it is mainly an issue for children and teenagers. Bullying is everywhere. Wolves have their own pecking orders, and having had a fish tank for a few years as a kid, it even seems to occur among fish. Even with "good natured" teasing a person is many times being tested subconsciously for where to be placed in the social packing order. It is just as much an issue for girls as it is with boys. Sometimes things get more complicated with girls as bullying can be even more subtle, and while boys may be encouraged to "be a man" and defend themselves, a girl may be encouraged to "be a lady" and politely drop the subject (of course this can also depend on the type of abuse).  Bullying can also continue into adulthood- especially in the form of scapegoating. The person can end up being the one to blame for all that goes wrong. In adulthood it is even more often very subtle and covert. There are many different types of bullying and scapegoating as well as different ways in which people can participate. Passive-aggressive bullying is everywhere and very elusive to identify. Gossip and manipulation can do far more damage than most physical bullying. Gossip and prepare the path for a bully by socially isolating or discrediting the victim so that they won't have as many people to back them up. There are even bullies who take on the appearance of do-gooders. It's hard to explain what I mean by this, but sometimes when people think they are saying or doing something for another's "own good" it's really not.
       Nowadays, anti-bullying has become a fad. The "coolest" celebrities are jumping on the bandwagon. Whether this is indeed an "epidemic" as the media tends to spin it is subjective, but I do know that it's hardly anything new. Unfortunately I was bullied before "victimhood" became fashionable. Overall, I am pleased that this issue is being addressed publicly, but there is a cynic in me that suspects that some of it can be plastic, especially if one is to read between the lines. Much of the anti-bullying debate is geared to specific groups of people. Two of the most common groups are those with Autism/Aspergers and LGBT... youth. I am not saying this is bad in and of itself. No one should have to take abuse regardless of their neurological status or their sexuality. The problem is with focusing the bullying awareness to select groups. For one thing if people are put into groups where they are perceived as sacred cows, it may stop bullying on the surface but create a resentment (or a begrudgery) which may haunt people in the long run. Also one should not need a label, group identity, or formal diagnosis to be treated fairly or to feel safe.
       As for solutions, suggestions and interventions I unfortunately don't have any simplistic "one-size-fits-all" solutions. I can give suggestions. First I would suggest investigating every individual situation and put yourself in the shoes of the people involved. Listen to all sides of the story. Using intuition is imperative. Also aim to create a culture where physical violence is not accepted. I'm not saying that kids can never play like kids or boys can't be boys within reason, but things have to be mutual. If someone seems upset, investigate. Places like rest rooms, locker rooms and showers are common places for bullying in ways both physical and verbal. These environments are often unsupervised and yet when kids are changing clothing or using the bathroom they are most vulnerable and exposed. Kids who are overweight, or have physical differences are especially vulnerable. I'm not saying someone needs to stand over people and watch as I can see how that can be mutually uncomfortable- and creepy, but at least have someone of authority within ear shot in case someone needs help. The cliches of jocks...being jocks... may seem like harmless, typical immaturity, but it can easily escalate to something more serious. I hate to be even this blunt but seriously, these are areas where ugly things can happen.
       In the case of people with Autism, it's not impossible that they can learn ways to defend themselves to a point, but remember they may have delayed reaction time and many also have sensory sensitivities. What looks like harmless tickling can be torture to some people. Some can be startled by loud noises and bullies can use that thinking if the person reports it they will look petty. Don't assume that the individual is just overreacting. One reason people on the spectrum can be frequent scapegoats is that they have a harder time getting credibility when they discuss how they are treated. The attitude is sometimes "Who's being bullied?", "Oh him/her, but he/she is a little weird or maybe a little slow..." Then people roll their eyes and don't even want to investigate.
       Most of all the people intervening need to be sincere at the deepest level. The moment people find the bad behavior cute or funny, even if the bully gets the worst short-term punishment, kids can intuitively sense if the adults are taking things seriously. In the case of verbal abuse, "Just ignore them." or "You tell them to knock it off!" doesn't always work and suggesting a witty one-line comeback will do little or no good after the fact. It's also important to recognise that a conflict can be more complicated than perceived and not to make the "bully" into the scapegoat. Many times the "good" kids are passively participating knowing that they will come out looking pretty. The so called "bully" is sometimes just doing the dirty work and is being used as a scapegoat themselves. As for supporting anti-bullying laws it is hard to be for or against them without knowing the details. I'm not saying that they can never help, but if they are too simplistic and blind the laws themselves can end up being manipulated and abused. It is most important to prevent bullying by creating a culture of mutual respect for the individual differences of others. In other words fight bullying at it's roots. If we just handle the "incidents" were just fighting the manifestations of the problem and the aggressors will just keep changing their methods and become even more clever. Being approachable is also important. It has to be easy for people to report abuse of all types with the expectations of confidentially and professionalism. It's also important to not jump to conclusions and to handle the situations individually with fairness and empathy.

Anxiety:

(I wrote this article for an upcomong newsletter on anxiety and how it related to Autism. For that reason there may be some stuff on here I already mentioned in my older posts. I'll post a copy on here anyway.)

       Anxiety is one of those pervasive things that everyone experiences at some time or another, but for many people it can be it can be a major albatross. Anxiety disorders are common among the general population, and especially common for those on the Autistic spectrum. Not to say that every Autistic person has anxiety issues, but many do and there many ways that anxiety can affect those on the spectrum in peculiar ways.
       For one thing many Autistic people tend to worry a lot. I think very often people with logical/analytical type minds (which are common though not universal on the spectrum) are prone to a "What if?" mentality. This may even be useful in some lines of work, but it can also be a problem. While many people, especially young people have problems caused by not considering potential consequences to things. I feel many Autistic people can be the other extreme. Others on the spectrum may even have a combination of both extremes.
       Sometimes a large portion of what can make it difficult for an Autistic person who seems "high functioning" can be Anxiety related. Of course many people who are either not Autistic or never had anxiety issues of their own may have a hard time understanding it and can oversimplify things in an attempt to help. I myself have experience with both. There are of course many different causes and treatments for anxiety (for those both Autistic or not Autistic) which are best left up to professionals who are familiar with each individual case to handle. Some people can be helped with counseling, while for others the cause is organic and requires medication. I know "medication" is a dirty word for many and I understand things may be over prescribed but for some people it is beneficial. Anxiety/panic attacks are also a common manifestation of Anxiety and are frequently misunderstood and mislabeled. I will get to them later. Anxiety can manifest in many ways and can often masquerade as many people, especially adults are ashamed to admit to it out of fear of appearing weak. Also men may feel a cultural need to cover up anxiety and fear for obvious reasons. Also professionals may feel the need to cover up anxiety and especially panic attacks out of fear of appearing unprofessional or losing credibility and people's respect. Instead one may complain of being under the weather and needing to get some fresh air. Even if one admits to what is really happening there is an assumption that others won't understand even if they intend to be "nice" about it. Also one might not want to upset the other person leading to 2 people panicking and creating a vicious cycle. Once anxiety escalates to this level a polite "It's OK, don't worry..." is not going to cut it. Many times panic attacks can also be organic or a reaction to medications. Reasoning with the person won't always help.
       One issue that is common for Autistic people are sensory sensitivities. Many sensory stimuli that are mundane or mildly unpleasant for the average person can be overwhelming or terrifying to an Autistic person. This can be especially an issue with "higher functioning" people on the spectrum as they may be more likely to try to know what they're feeling is not typical and try to conceal their issues. Sensory sensitivities are not the same as phobias but can be easily mistaken for one of them. Sensory issues are not something that someone can be rationalized out of. A person may already know that for example a loud noise or strong odor is not going to harm them but cannot help the way they feel. Telling people not to worry so much and giving "pep talks" on self esteem, self confidence, or using the common pop-psychology methods for dealing with anxiety is just going to miss the point. It always helps to provide perspective and to educate people on the things they are anxious about, especially if there are unfounded fears such as "monsters under the bed". But many times the problem is organic and a different approach is needed. This is where a professional comes in. I'm not sure if sensory sensitivities can be "cured" and we can't always avoid the environments which are painful for us, but we can sort things out to allow for reasonable accommodations and make compromises with the outside world.
       As for anxiety or panic "attacks" we have another issue that needs to be addressed for both Autistic people and the general population. Many times these go undiagnosed. Other times people confuse them with Generalized Anxiety or a more common panic reaction to a crisis. Many people have them and don't even know what they are. Many people have more than once made fruitless trips to the emergency room only to be told that nothing is wrong. These can cause someone to feel as if they are going to have a heart attack, a stroke, are getting sick, or are about to pass out... For me I have mistaken them for Asthma attacks. I do not have severe Asthma, but was diagnosed with mild Asthma as a small child. As I got older I have experienced what I thought were Asthma attacks only to look back and realize that they were anxiety related. What seemed like Asthma may have been hyperventilation. Besides, having Asthma is far more socially acceptable than anxiety attacks, especially for a guy. For a person who is non-verbal, anxiety and/or panic is of course going to manifest in less direct ways.
       Control of one's environment is another issue common for Autistic individuals. This is not to say that Autistic people are necessarily "controlling" in a domineering or narcissistic sense, nor am I implying that Autistic people must always get their way. What I'm saying is that many on the spectrum get extreme anxiety in environments where they have little control or escape. Many also feel the need to always know what to expect. Many phobias among the general population stem from control issues. An example is that many people afraid of flying are aware of the statistics which state that flying is safer than riding in a car and may even believe the statistics, yet they have no problem driving anywhere. The difference is that the more risky option is one they have more control of while in the less risky option they are at the mercy of a pilot whom they can't see and probably have never even met. There is no easy solution to this, as nobody is going to be able to know everything that is going to happen or be able to completely control their environments, but again people can make reasonable accommodations and if possible provide options to help a person feel less "trapped". Many times those with Claustrophobia or Agoraphobia have similar issues.  
       Seasonal depression, while not necessarily related to Autism, can also involve anxiety. I myself find that while I am the way I am all year, anxiety tends to spike for me in the Winter months. Researchers cannot seem to agree on exactly what causes this pattern or if it even exists. I do find it helpful for both anxiety and depression to get as much natural light as possible in the Winter. This too however, can have some relation to control. In the Winter the combination of darkness, cold weather and sometimes heavy snow tends keep a person indoors and can add to a perception of confinement. Also people may feel less in control as driving is not always a safe option and neither is opening windows or constantly running in and out of the house. Seasonal depression or anxiety too can have many causes and what I'm mentioning are only thoughts.
       No matter what the cause is for someones anxiety, it is definitely something for people to be aware of so that people don't have to live with one hand tied behind their back while having no idea why. In dealing with the Autistic population it is important to understand that their anxiety may have a different dynamic than that of the general population. When possible, it is important that these people are able to identify and freely share what is "really" bothering them without judgment. After that there are many ways to address the issues based on the individual. If there is one thing that I can say from experience does help (though not a cure) is awareness both on the part of the person suffering anxiety and those involved with them. Sometimes after much experience and identifying patterns in our own anxiety, we can tell ourselves that what we are experiencing is just anxiety and not "food poisoning", an allergic reaction, or impending doom. We can also become educated on recognizing signs of more serious problems like a heart attack or diabetic shock... so that we can discern the gravity of a situation more accurately. Having a smart phone and being able to Google things I am anxious about has helped me a lot, though one shouldn't over-do the research or it can have the opposite effect. All these suggestions I am giving are not meant to be a cure. When a problem has an organic cause we can't always help how we feel, but we can learn to manage it to a point.

More from Dr. Temple Grandin

       I am posting this abstract not because I agree or disagree with the content, but because it is an interesting topic. This discusses more on the connection between Autistic people and animals from a professional who has Autism. I am also not implying that every individual on the spectrum has a special connection with animals or even has interest in animals. I do feel however that many Autistic people do and Dr. Grandin has some interesting perspectives. I must say this article is long. http://www.grandin.com/welfare/animals.people.autism.true.consciousness.html

An Autistic Artist

       Steven Wiltshire is sometimes referred to as a "human camera". He is an Autistic artist in London, UK: http://www.allmediany.com/details_news_article.php?news_artid=3278. The following link is his own website: http://www.stephenwiltshire.co.uk/. From the same website is his biography: http://www.stephenwiltshire.co.uk/biography.aspx.
       This man is sometimes referred to as an Autistic savant. Not all people on the Autistic spectrum are savants, but this guy is just an extraordinary example.
      

Now here is a nice way to spend winter...

       Too bad Japan is so far away. The Japanese Macaques or "Snow Monkeys" take advantage of the natural hot springs to keep warm.

Japanese Macaques, by: Yosemite on Wikimedia Commons 2005


Japanese Macaque, by: Bukk on Wikimedia Commons 2010

This is the full article on them: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snow_monkey

Another somewhat remote place:

Billings, MT:
(That hotel looks like it needs a power-wash or something)

Billings skyline, by: Pruhter on Wikimedia Commons 2008



Downtown Billings, MT, by: Ron Rehring
on Wikimedia Commons 2007

Speaking of obscure...

Here's Ushuaia, Argentina- one of the southernmost cities in the world:

Ushuaia, by: Jerzy Strzelecki on Wikimedia Commons 2000

The Hipster Paradox

       One of my favorite paradox of contemporary times is that of the hipsters as explained in this article: http://www.louisvillecardinal.com/2011/11/hipster-paradox-underground-mainstream/. I have no intention of picking on anyone here or especially judging any individual. I just can't help but to make some general observations. I'm only using this one paradox as an example of human nature in general. For an explanation of what a hipster is see Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hipster_(contemporary_subculture). (You know you're on the Autism spectrum when you use Wikipedia or even Urban Dictionary to understand the contemporary world.)
       In American culture, every generation seems to rebel against the last and there is a vicious cycle of snobbery vs. reverse snobbery, and of conformity vs. non-conformity. We had the "roaring twenties", then the Great Depression, then the suburban 50's, then the hippies. Many of the hippies turned into yuppies in the early 1980's. Then came the 90's with "alternative", grunge, and gangster rap. After that we had the metrosexual(If you're not familiar with any of these terms, look it up.) I know the term "metrosexual" seems very 2003 but I think it was mainly a regurgitation of the early 1980's yuppie. After that there was "emo" and "hipsters". I'm in my 30's now so I'm not as familiar with the past couple of years as younger people may be. I never really fit into any of these trends myself. I do have a few things in common with hipsters however. As seen on some of my chosen blog topics I do have a strong curiosity for anything obscure. I too get tired of the superficiality of pop-culture. I also appreciate creativity and love healthy food. On the other hand I'm not into aviator sunglasses and I dress rather plain. I don't go around pretending that I'm the first of my generation to have discovered Jimi Hendrix or psychedelic rock. My musical taste is undefined but I do like some pop music and I'm not afraid to admit it.
       I can remember the show "Frasier" which was big around the metrosexual period. It good-naturedly poked fun at upper-middle-class snobbery and juxtaposed it against a down-to-earth father. I also was reading a blog post (which I'd rather not link to as the tone was a little...harsh) where somewhere compared hipsters to hillbillies. They pointed out the similarities in the lifestyles which at first appear opposite. The article then observed how a hipster may look down on people who eat meat, while the hillbilly frowns on vegetarians. I mean they're just fun generalizations but there is a point here.
       My intent with this post is to make a fun example of how the human ego works. We may observe something wrong with the world, rebel against it, then become smug, and finally we end up becoming like the people we are judging. It all goes back and forth becoming a vicious cycle. Also, once non-conformists become "cool" and gain respect then they become the conformists and begin rejecting people the same way they once feel that they were rejected. I learned this the hard way. I was in many ways a non-conformist and figured I'd maybe fit in better with the "alternative", grunge, "Pearl Jammer", Gothic, raver... crowd which I had little in common with but I didn't think I had to. I only realized that they could be just as selective, judgmental, unapproachable and sometimes arrogant as the so called "popular crowd" (jocks, preps...). Only advantage is that the "coffee house" alternative crowd seemed lees inclined toward bullying. There is also internal snobbery in non-conformist subcultures. People end up pointing fingers regarding who is authentic and who is a wanna-be. Once the rebellion becomes imitated and more mainstream then people have to try to convince the world that "they" were the first to sport ugly vintage sunglasses before it became cool and that everyone else including celebrities somehow copied off of them. It's just funny how people can go from hating the "bourgeoisie" to developing some of the same shallow characteristics that they perceived as being "bourgeoisie".
       Oh and another thing...this I observed before the whole hipster thing but the "Salvation Army chic" look confuses me. I mean I love thrift shops. I have found some nice clothes there and I love frugality. I also admire creative people who will use old clothes from the thrift shop and create a new look with it. Of course some people can pull off just about anything. I cannot, therefore I tend to be more cautious. Where things start to get ridiculous is when very expensive designer brands that market to the "snob community" and up selling new clothes that are made to look like the clothes of a homeless person with deliberate fading and ripped in several places but then sell them at obscenely high prices. That on the other hand is neither frugal nor creative. I mean maybe there's more to it that I just don't get, but if I were a homeless person I wouldn't know whether to feel flattered or insulted. I mean people spending huge amounts of money to look like the people whom they would never associate with to save their lives seems like a huge contradiction to me.      
       Overall I still see individuality and creativity as a good thing, but it is necessary to keep the ego in check as when exercising any virtue. I think it's at the moment that we become smug when we become more like the people we judge and the Devil has a good laugh.
       There does seem to be a parallel between "hipster" culture and "Autistic/Aspergers" culture. There is non-conformity in both except that Aspergers is not a chosen lifestyle (though some people seem to perceive it that way). Sometimes I even get on occasional of reverse snobbery in the "ASD community". This of course doesn't make those with ASD better or worse than neurotypical people, just equal.

The Highest Point in the UK

Ben-Nevis is the highest point in both Scotland and the UK as a whole:

Carn Mor Dearg & Ben Nevis, by: Andrew Morison 2005

Ben-Nevis, photo: Mogens Engelund, 2008

The Real Cupid or Cupid(s):

       To celebrate Valentines' Day I thought I'd read up on who the real St. Valentine was. Apparently not that much is known for certain about these martyrs.

St. Valentine Kneeling, by: David Teniers (III) (1638–1685)

       I can remember in grade school how we would exchange valentines and candy. I can clearly remember those heart candies with the words on them. The ones that were pastel colored and tasted like Pepto Bismol. I went to Catholic school and yet I had no idea who St. Valentine was nor did I give it much thought. Apparently, there are several martyrs named St. Valentine in the early church and today is their feast. Ever notice how many times the apostrophe in Valentines' Day is after the "s"? Well this is probably why. How it evolved from a feast day of several martyrs to a day of artificially flavored candy, and romance is a long story and it still doesn't make much sense. It's all good though. Reading about these saints can provide a deeper and more inclusive meaning to this day. It can also be a comfort to those who feel left out today because they are single. BTW for those who do feel that way just remember that most of the world doesn't celebrate Valentines' Day. Even many happy, loving couples don't. This is a day mainly recognized in the culturally Christian West anyway most of the world is not cuddling up by the fireplace eating dark chocolate and listening to Lionel Ritchie (or some sort of elevator music).

For more information read:
http://www.catholic.org/saints/saint.php?saint_id=159
and Catholic Encyclopedia:
http://www.catholic.org/saints/saint.php?saint_id=159

Don't forget your winter coat:

       If New York is "The Big Apple", then I guess Minneapolis, MN is the "Little Apple"... Low temperatures in this city during the winter tend to average in the low single digits (Fahrenheit). Nevertheless, I hear the Summers are pleasant there and for some strange reason I like saying the word "Minneapolis".

Minneapolis on the Mississippi River, by: Jdkoenig on Wikimedia Commons 2007
(The Stone Arch Bridge)


Downtown Minneapolis, by: Luis Cortez on Wikimedia Commons 2007


Downtown Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA from the South
by: Alexius Horatius on Wikimedia Commons 2010

North and South:

       I'm not usually a fan of cold, commie block style architecture but in this photo of Wonsan, North Korea there is an interesting effect. Maybe it's just the lighting and the angle that makes it look nice for this photograph but still... I know in a lot of these not-so-free countries the outside world only sees what the powers that be want them to see. There does seem to be a lot of natural beauty in North Korea at least.

Wonson Waterfront, North Korea, by: Shih Tung Ngiam on Wikimedia Commons, 2008

       Then there is the other Korea. Now that I just showed a city of North Korea let us then go to South Korea and notice the contrast. This is Busan:

Park and Zenith skyscrapers in Haeundae, Busan, South Korea
by: Airplane360 on Wikimedia Commons 2011


Busan, South Korea, by: Freebiekr on Wikimedia Commons 2011

"Live Free or Die" but don't wear perfume...

       I'm not surprised but I still can't believe it. New Hampshire is considering joining other places on a "perfume ban". Now since I don't like to spin or exaggerate even when it's tempting I will post a link to the news article: http://articles.boston.com/2012-02-11/health-wellness/31045055_1_scent-perfume-state-employees. For those who don't have time to read the article this ban will only affect state employees who have contact with the public, it is only being considered- in other words it wasn't passed yet, but it may affect all wearing of fragrances such as perfume, scented hair spray, scented deodorant, and scented dryer sheets. Such laws have already taken place in other places. Luckily New Hampshire doesn't usually have long or hot Summers.
       New Hampshire is a rather unique state. New England for the most part was settled by pragmatic "Yankees". New Hampshire however had a good amount of Scotch-Irish settlement also- which is not as common in the Northeast as it is in the South and West. In general this state was historically a bastion of libertarianism and individualism for the Northeast. "Live free or die" is the state motto.
       I will try to empathize with both sides on this. As someone who blogs about Autism and sensory sensitivities (whether or not they relate to Autism), one would expect me to be more sympathetic to this law. Instead I have some reservations. What I read about this so far sounds somewhat reasonable, but I feel this can open up a Pandora's box when it comes to "nanny-state" regulations. I have mentioned before I do have a lot of sensory sensitivities, mine are not affected by perfume, but for many others fragrance can be an issue. Fragrance can be a practical way to mask odor if done in addition to good hygiene, but it is also a form of self-expression sort of like wearing jewelry, putting up Christmas lights, or shooting fireworks. Some people overdo the self-expression until it violates the personal space of others such as when people blast their car stereo to unnecessarily disturbing levels. I've always been good with playing music but I'll admit I have overdone it with fragrances myself many times. While my sense of smell is acute, I still can't always smell myself. I'll also admit I love fragrances whether it be cologne, incense, or air fresheners- maybe it's the Italian in me that just loves to add a little pizazz to life wherever I go. I can be rather picky and I prefer natural smells to fake ones. I feel that if we know we are going to be around people with allergies, Asthma, or sensory issues it is only common courtesy to tone it down. It is also common courtesy to turn ones music down when there is a baby sleeping within earshot, but I don't think that means we should ban music or create a decibel limit. I have also smelled many fragrances that I can't stand on other people but I will still take any of them over the smell of B.O., a cat litter box, or a garbage can. There will always be thoughtless or overbearing people who will abuse their freedoms, but that shouldn't be a reason to take them away for everyone.
       One could always say to just use unscented products, keep the house clean, and bathe daily, yet depending on the environment sometimes cleanliness and unscented products just don't cut it. I think the proposed New Hampshire law can still be a very good "unwritten rule" yet as a de jure law I'm not even sure how they would even plan on enforcing it. I luckily never had severe Asthma but I realize that some people do. I did have mild Asthma as a child and seasonal allergies. Grass and poplar tree pollen makes me hooked of antihistamines around the first week of June every year, yet I'm not sure if I would demand that everyone in town be forced by law to mow their lawns every day so none of the grass goes to seed. The proposed law is hardly the end of the world in itself but where will it stop? Should fireworks be banned? Many people and pets are terrified of them. Should churches be forced to stop the centuries old tradition of burning frankincense and myrrh? At least NH has the decency to keep this ban limited the public sphere and not private businesses. But in other places it may go further.
       Even in a libertarian environment things aren't always cut-and-dry. The libertarian philosophy protects individual rights insofar as they don't infringe on the rights and welfare of others. Applying that to the real world and deciding exactly where an individuals rights leaves off and those of another begin can get complicated. In an ideal world common courtesy should step in and we shouldn't have to keep splitting hairs in such a legalistic way. At one time people were allowed to smoke in hospital rooms and there wasn't always much people could do about it. I'm old enough to remember teachers in grade school smoking in front of the class. That was not cool, but today the pendulum seems to be swinging the other way. I mean should restaurants and bakeries be forced into remote areas because the smell of the food and cause a pregnant woman in the neighborhood to get morning sickness? I tend to shutter when I hear speculation about cell phones affecting the brain and causing cancer. Whether this is true, false, or exaggerated truth it needs to be put in perspective. I sometimes worry that stuff like this can be used as propaganda to justify government control of communications and radio. Of course no one wants to see an innocent child die of cancer because someone near them was downloading video games though I don't see that happening anyway. I'm not a scientist but I can say with relative confidence that cell phones have saved more lives than they will ever take. Many people are concerned about the safety of chemicals, disinfectants, and preservatives, but it allowing food poisoning outbreaks which can kill many the answer? It's more a matter of weighing the pros and cons. I'm no a fan of heavy pesticide use, but I wonder if we never had them if healthy food would become more scarce and expensive and cause a worse public health problem as the poor may never be able to afford fresh produce due to pests and plant diseases.
       One of my biggest issues of these types of laws is how they are so vague to enforce. Drinking and driving is a little different since it can be verified and measured with blood tests. Daydreaming and driving is also dangerous but how can it be enforced? Should there be a law banning driving for 48 hours after one is dumped by a significant other?
       Last week I came across a blog where somebody mentioned how peppermint smells such as those in gum and breath mints make them sick. Personally I would take any smell over bad breath (and yes- some people with perfect oral hygiene can still get bad breath). I can empathize with that person as I have some odd sensory sensitivities myself and if I ever met that person in real life I will refrain from using minty stuff. Every other time I will keep my Listerine strips handy. I think the best approach to these issues is to raise public awareness of sensory sensitivities and make reasonable accommodations for the individuals we come in contact with as a matter of common courtesy. People should also be encouraged to to up front about any serious sensitivities or allergies- I mean serious ones- not so much pet-peeves. This way we can have a more hospitable world without giving up our freedoms in the process.

Everybody's Special vs. Nobody's Special

       To many one of the most patronizing things heard on childrens' programming is the cliche "Everybody's Special", although most people including me, agree with that statement. The notion of "All men are created equal." is deeply ingrained in American culture. This is important in our understanding of human rights. Egalitarianism however, has it's paradox. If everybody is special, does that mean nobody is special? While most people in some way have some egalitarian sympathies, it's the question of "everybody vs. nobody" where people seem to disagree.
       In applying this to the Autism Awareness movement as well as awareness of other developmental differences, there are a lot of controversies. "Special" for one thing has become a euphemism for people with special needs, particularly the intellectually disabled (which not all Autistic people are). It is also common to feel that groups of people who have undergone marginalization, misunderstanding, rejection, bullying, or prejudice from others to be thought of by some as better than or "special" compared to the people who oppressed or looked down on them. This can seem fair and reasonable at first. I mean isn't it nice to tell a child who is being bullied that some day that bully will be washing their dishes? The problem here is that if everybody's special, than we cant have "sacred cows".
       I have been a self-advocate for a good few years now and have made some observations along the way. At first we barely heard of Autism let alone Aspergers. Then people began hearing about it more and gradually becoming more understanding. One of the most common observations people make of the Autistic community is how many of them also have "special gifts". This is true to a point and it also helps in gaining public support as people wonder if the Autistic child they support may invent the gadget or gizmo that may save their life someday. When the special gifts given to Autistic individuals is promoted whether they are intellectual or even spiritual, there are sometimes misunderstandings. Yes, the honeymoon is sort of over, people are starting to get jaded, and a subtle backlash is setting in. When any group is perceived (or mis-perceived) as a "golden boy" or "sacred cow", begrudgery starts to sneak into the picture. It becomes even worse for the so called "higher functioning" self-advocates who get perceived as either "faking it" or milking their diagnosis for narcissistic reasons. Also people in the communities of other special needs end up resentful or even competitive toward those in the Autism community or any other "flavor of the week". This could harm these movements in the long run. On one hand I am in no way denying that many Autistic people have special gifts to share with the world and I'm also not denying that there may be elements of favoritism or narcissism within the Autism or any other "community". As a Catholic Christian I just feel that God created us all equal in dignity and that all humans have "special gifts" and purpose which we may never see or understand until the next world. The thing is in some people the "gifts" are visible in the form or material success, high intellect, visible high achievement, or in physical beauty. Even those born with single digit IQ's or those who have a short time in this world have an equal purpose or plan as everyone else. The thing is that in many people with developmental differences of all types is that their gifts are not often noticed. The same can be said for oppressed minority groups of all types. Many times when people are perceived inferior and they begin to assert their equality, it's is then perceived as narcissism. Of course you will always have those who over-compensate and develop a sort of "reverse snobbery" and an "attitude", but the pendulum has to stop in the middle.
       Many times a self-advocate may be trying to point out some peculiarities observed in the "gifts" of Autistic people. This does not necessarily mean that they are implying that Autistic people are "chosen people". I can't speak for everyone, but usually "we" are just trying to point out that those on the spectrum are different, yet equal.

Bonita

       I never heard of this place until a week or two ago. The beach resort of Benidorm, Spain sits on the Mediterranean coast and seems to be growing:

Benidorm, by: Siocaw on Wikimedia Commons, 2008

Now on the photo below I can't help but to notice the Golden Arches on the left. I guess it may help prevent American tourists from getting homesick but still, does it have to disturb the whole landscape like that? I mean I support capitalism and free enterprise but stuff like this gives it a bad name:

Benidorm, Marina Baixa, by: Joanbanjo on Wikimedia Commons, 2010

Then there is Barcelona. I've never been to Spain other than to fly over it but I'm a little more familiar with this city:

Barcelona Financial District, by: WelcomeInSpain on Wikimedia Commons, 2008

Barcelona is also home to a really big church called Sagrada Familia. It's a long story, so I will just link to it on Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sagrada_Fam%C3%ADlia
Below is a photo of it:
Sagrada Familia (Nativity Facade), by: Wjh31 on Wikimedia Commons, 2010

Filling in where awareness campaigns leave off...

       When I was at Mass(Catholic) last weekend, I couldn't help but to notice the prayer intentions. Usually in the middle of the Mass, the part when I tend to daydream the most, is a part where the priest reads off a few special intentions. Usually it's the names of a few ill or deceased parishioners and maybe world peace or something like that. One of them last weekend was to defeat the demons of prejudice and misunderstanding. That's not an unusual intention but I couldn't help but to notice the "and misunderstanding" part.
       Like many other things, prejudice has many causes and it would be dangerous to oversimplify everything into one cause. (Although the Catholic Church seems to narrow down the causes of evil in general into the Devil, the world, and the flesh.) Many Eastern and New Age traditions narrow everything down into "the ego" which can easily fit somewhere into the categories outlined in Catholic Theology. More on the "ego" later.
       Misunderstanding I feel, is one of the biggest causes of hate, fear, prejudice, and of individuals not getting along (especially among otherwise decent people). Many times two decent people agree that we should care for the poor, yet they differ only on the means to the end, leading to both sides thinking the other side is selfish. There are also too many other ways people can misunderstand each other on both an interpersonal or cultural level.
       Education and awareness is one of the biggest ways to eliminate misunderstanding. It's a never ending process. An example would be how we may never totally understand Autism though we can keep making progress. In the mean time there are countless other differences and issues that we have yet to understand. One side effect of "Awareness" is that educated people could end up thinking they have an understanding of others and making false assumptions based thinking that they are now "enlightened". Human awareness has it's limitations, but there is a way to fill in the gap. That would be humility. Not only does humility leave an empty space for truth to enter when it's ready, but it can also be liberating. While "awareness" can help us become more fair in our judgments of others (though only God is perfectly fair), humility and the magic of "I don't know." can liberate us further by having us leave the "judging" to a higher power. Humility can help us live with misunderstanding peacefully. There are a lot of mental conditions that we may not understand for generations to come and therefore it would be hard to know if something we observe in another person is a character fault, a result of their pathology, or a little of both. We might as well just stop guessing. Also, as a lifelong Westerner I may never understand everything about the culture of Sri Lanka (so far I have only met one person that I know of from that island). Yet I can still get along with a member of that culture by just accepting that there may be nuances in each-other's culture and language that neither of us fully understand.
       It is widely known that education is important for eliminating ignorance and misunderstandings, but there are caveats. Sometimes the best understanding and acceptance can come from the "ignorant" (a small child, a pet, or a person who is intellectually or educationally challenged, or even "Forrest Gump"). They may know little about cultural diversity, Autism Awareness, ADD, LGBT... issues, Agoraphobia, Schizophrenia, minority religions, or gender issues, yet they seem to accept almost anyone unless they have a serious reason not to. Ignorance is a weakness but not necessarily a fault but arrogance is always a fault. As for the ego, I feel that it causes not so much the misunderstandings, but it causes people to frown on what they don't understand.
       (I don't BTW imply that every time we get a bad vibe from another person or witness someone doing wrong that it's a misunderstanding, unfounded, and that there is no such thing as evil- there certainly is. God of course will take care of things and is the only One with enough information to make a truly fair judgment. It's just that there are many times when what we see as a difference is actually a misperception and people end up seeing their friends as enemies.)
       Below is another article I found online on misunderstanding:
http://www.personal-development.com/chuck/misunderstanding.htm

Having something in common with a sports stadium:

       24 hours after the Superbowl, which I only glanced at parts of, I just thought of something. I'm looking at new articles everyday about this Autism diagnosis and labeling controversy. Labels change- people are still the same. I look at all these sports arenas and they change names more than some people change their hair-dos. Different companies keep buying them and a new sign needs to be put up, yet the rest of the structure usually remains the same.
       Here's another one of those articles: http://ph.omg.yahoo.com/news/proposed-autism-diagnostic-criteria-roils-medical-community-135251688.html

Russia's East Coast:

       Vladivostok is one of those cities which I tend to only hear about in documentaries. It's only a stone's throw away from China and North Korea. I figured I'd take advantage of the Internet and look at some photos of it:

Golden Horn, by: TarzanASG on Wikimedia Commons, 2008


Central Vladivostok, by: TarzanASG on Wikimedia Commons, 2009

Europe's "Far East":

       The Ural Mountains mark most of the border of Europe and Asia. Yekaterinburg lies on this border. The area has a harsh continental climate, but it still has some notable cities:

City view of Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation
by: Anagoria on Wikimedia Commons, 2011


Yekaterinburg Skyline
by: Владислав Фальшивомонетчик on Wikimedia Commons, 2009

More on "selective" critical thinking:

       In this link http://antiintellect.wordpress.com/2011/07/27/selective-critical-thinking/ is a blog post which gives more example of what I was saying previously on "selective" critical thinking. I guess this is why it helps for everyone to admit that nobody is immune to bias and to accept that we can sometimes be wrong about something.

Feast of St. Blaise

       Today is a day when Roman Catholics traditionally got their throats blessed in honor of St. Blaise. St. Blaise was an Armenian man martyred for his beliefs. He is regarded as a patron saint for afflictions of the throat. http://www.americancatholic.org/features/saints/saint.aspx?id=1280

Dear Mr. Groundhog (or Woodchuck),

       Thank you for helping us all out in predicting the weather. I understand you are among some of the most intelligent animals around. Just do me a favor and tell your "people" to go easy on my backyard when spring does arrive. I don't mind them taking a few nibbles here and there if there is a drought or something, but some of the damage done to our plants is costing my family a fortune in both time and money. There is plenty of dandelion and clover outside out property line for them to munch on. Happy Groundhog Day...

Marmota Monax, posted by Reinhard Kraasch
on Wikimedia Commons, 2008

More on this rather sophisticated mammal: http://www.fcps.edu/islandcreekes/ecology/woodchuck.htm
(They even build their own private restrooms underground...)

Can critical thinking be taught in a classroom?

       The answer I guess would be yes, I mean colleges even offer courses in both logic and critical thinking...but I do see limitations to how much of it can be taught. One of the hard parts of learning some things is learning how to apply what was just learned in real life. I feel the most important thing in trying to reach the truth is to be able to put biases and ego aside first. This is way easier said than done. One can take courses in logic, critical thinking, and propaganda techniques all they want but the ego can still manage to find ways around it. Many people who are professionals may have PhD's, be experts in their fields, and even take critical thinking courses yet they still don't always agree with each other on everything.
       When I see political debates on TV, usually the pundits shown are professionals with respectable degrees- many times with a background in law or political science... Most of them are aware of what critical thinking is and claim to value and use it, yet they apply it selectively to real life. They may use it only when it supports their ideological identity. This is part of what makes identifying with ideological labels so problematic.
       Humility is also a nice compliment to critical thinking as well as agnosticism- yes I'm still a Catholic- I don't mean "that" kind of agnosticism. I'm talking more of the ability to say "I don't know." when appropriate or at least a temporary "I don't know." until more information is available. I think when one is a professional who is well respected, it can be even more difficult to "plea the fifth". I think this could be why we get such conflicting medical advice in the media. Sometimes in science if something can't be proven true, it is dismissed as a "myth". The thing is that it is difficult to prove a negative. An example would be if an herb called "X" can prevent colds and the flu. Years could pass without any proof from science to back up the claims. The home remedy is then dismissed as "snake oil" (maybe it is maybe it isn't). Even if it may seem unlikely that herb "X" works, one may never know for sure and it takes professional courage to admit it. Life on other planets is another example. From what I have most recently read many scientists are expressing doubt that it is likely, yet I think it would be arrogant of anyone to say that it is proven to not exist. Even if the universe were discovered to have walls, no one can prove that there isn't anything far beyond that wall. An honest "I don't know" is not necessarily a cop-out, if anything it leaves room for the real truth to come in later on- if it ever comes.
       In browsing free podcasts I came across one that is associated with this site. This site is by a college professor who tried to explain critical thinking. It is a little involved and some if it I had a hard time keeping up with but it can be a good resource nevertheless: http://www.criticalthinkeracademy.com/
       It is also important for people to accept that truth cannot be owned, sold, or patented. If one tries it just magically turns into untruth. Some people may notice my frequent use of words like "maybe" and "perhaps" quite a bit on this blog. Some may interpret it as fence-sitting, wishy-washy, low self-esteem, low self-confidence but anything is batter than false confidence. I feel if one wants "truth" it is necessary to make room for it.